Intramuscular on demand analgesia: double blind controlled trial of pethidine, buprenorphine, morphine, and meptazinol.

نویسندگان

  • M Harmer
  • P J Slattery
  • M Rosen
  • M D Vickers
چکیده

An on demand intramuscular analgesic system using the Cardiff Palliator was tested. Forty consenting patients were studied after cholecystectomy in a double blind trial using increments of buprenorphine (0.15 mg), meptazinol (50 mg), morphine (5 mg), and pethidine (50 mg). Most patients attained good levels of pain relief (mean analogue pain score 36.5), comparable to intravenous on demand analgesia. There were no technical complications. Significant differences were found between drugs in dizziness (pethidine produced the worst score) but not with other side effects. Buprenorphine produced longer lasting analgesia than meptazinol or pethidine and also gave the lowest pain scores. Patterns of analgesic consumption were the same as with intravenous on demand systems, but larger amounts of drug were generally used. Relative analgesic potencies derived from drug consumption rates were also consistent with those from intravenous on demand studies. An on demand intramuscular analgesic system offers a simple but effective means of relieving severe postoperative pain.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Analgesia after operation. A controlled comparison of meptazinol, pentazocine and pethidine.

In a double-blind investigation of the efficacy on pain following abdominal or orthopaedic surgery, meptazinol 100 mg, a new hexahydroazepine derivative, was found to be equipotent with pentazocine 60 mg and pethidine 100 mg when given i.m. Analgesia was maximal 30-60 min after injection and was still present at the end of 2 h. The duration of action of meptazinol was estimated to be 4 h. Mepta...

متن کامل

Prospective double-blind comparison of buprenorphine and pethidine in ureteric colic.

In a double-blind prospective trial 26 consecutive patients with proved ureteric colic were allocated at random to receive 100 mg pethidine or 0.3 mg buprenorphine by intramuscular injection. Pain relief was assessed by standard linear analogue and ordered categories scales. The mean pain relief on the linear analogue scale was 3.80 +/- SEM 0.64 in patients receiving pethidine and 6.86 +/- 0.40...

متن کامل

Comparison of buprenorphine and pethidine given intravenously on demand to relieve postoperative pain.

In a double-blind study of on-demand intravenous analgesia buprenorphine was found to be about 600 times as potent as pethidine. The incidence of side effects was similar with both drugs. The quality of analgesia, subjectively assessed, was good with both drugs using this method of administration. Provided that its low potential for abuse is substantiated, buprenorphine appears to be a powerful...

متن کامل

The use of intravenous meptazinol for analgesia in colonoscopy.

A double blind study comparing intravenous pethidine and meptazinol has been performed to establish the efficacy and safety of meptazinol as an analgesic agent in colonoscopy. Twenty two patients received pethidine and 23 patients received meptazinol and no difference in analgesic effect or sedative effect could be demonstrated either by observer or patient assessment using a visual analogue sc...

متن کامل

The IDvIP Trial: A two-centre randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia

BACKGROUND Intramuscular pethidine is routinely used throughout the UK for labour analgesia. Studies have suggested that pethidine provides little pain relief in labour and has a number of side effects affecting mother and neonate. It can cause nausea, vomiting and dysphoria in mothers and can cause reduced fetal heart rate variability and accelerations. Neonatal effects include respiratory dep...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • British medical journal

دوره 286 6366  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1983